EAJAIC

The Eurasian Journal of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (EAJAIC) is an independent-unbiased, peer-reviewed, "double-blind", and open-access journal of current national and international issues and reviews for original clinical and experimental research, interesting case reports, differential diagnoses, editorial opinions, letters to the editor, and educational papers in anesthesiology, algology, and intensive care medicine.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Antibacterial effects of levobupivacaine against staphylococcus aureus in a patient-controlled epidural analgesia model: an in vitro experimental study
Aims: Catheter-related infections remain an important complication of epidural analgesia. Local anesthetics may contribute to infection prevention because of their antimicrobial properties. This study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of clinically relevant concentrations of levobupivacaine against Staphylococcus aureus in a simulated patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) model.
Methods: An in vitro experimental PCEA infusion system was established using epidural catheter tubing and 0.2-µm bacterial filters. Four study groups were prepared: 0.125% levobupivacaine + fentanyl, 0.0625% levobupivacaine + fentanyl, fentanyl-only solution, and saline control. Each solution was inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Solutions were infused continuously for 24 hours. Samples obtained from the filter inlet, outlet, and collection chambers were cultured microbiologically. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate bacterial retention at the filter surface.
Results: The saline control group demonstrated the highest bacterial colony counts, whereas levobupivacaine-containing solutions demonstrated significantly lower bacterial colony counts compared with the saline control group (p < 0.05). Increasing levobupivacaine concentration was associated with stronger antibacterial activity. No bacterial growth was detected distal to the epidural bacterial filter in any study group. SEM analysis confirmed bacterial accumulation on the proximal surface of the filter membrane.
Conclusion: Levobupivacaine exhibited concentration-dependent antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus in a simulated PCEA model, while epidural bacterial filters effectively prevented bacterial passage under experimental conditions.


1. Azi LMTA, Fonseca NM, Linard LG. SBA 2020: regional anesthesia safety recommendations update. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70(4):398-418. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.005
2. Provenzano DA, Hanes M, Hunt C, et al. ASRA Pain Medicine consensus practice infection control guidelines for regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105651
3. Johnson SM, Saint John BE, Dine AP. Local anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: a review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008;9(2):205-213. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.036
4. Heller S, Seemann RJ, Burgkart R, Obermeier A, Locher H. Lidocaine shows significant antimicrobial effects against Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biomedicines. 2025;13(1):106. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010106
5. Lee JS, Moon J, Lee JY, et al. Antibacterial activity of local anesthetics against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Microorganisms. 2025;17(6):4774-4778. doi: 10.62347/GKXF8390
6. Sakuragi T, Ishino H, Dan K. Bactericidal activity of clinically used local anes-thetics on Staphylococcus aureus. Reg Anesth. 1996;21(3):239-242. doi: 10.1136/rapm-00115550-199621030-00011
7. Ohsuka S, Ohta M, Masuda K, Arakawa Y, Kaneda T, Kato N. Lidocaine hydro-chloride and acetylsalicylate kill bacteria by disrupting the bacterial membrane potential in different ways. Microbiol Immunol. 1994;38(6):429-434. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1994.tb01803.x
8. Faustova M, Nazarchuk O, Dmytriiev D, Babina Y, Nazarchuk H, Dudar A. The effect of local anesthetics against planktonic forms and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1199899. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1199899
9. Tuon FF, Suss PH, Telles JP, Dantas LR, Borges NH, Ribeiro VST. Antimicrobial treatment and pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-associated infections. Pathogens. 2023;12(1):87-102. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010087
10. Hodson M, Gajraj R, Scott NB. A comparison of the antibacterial activity of levo-bupivacaine vs. bupivacaine: an in vitro study with bacteria implicated in epidural infection. Anaesthesia. 1999;54(7):699-702. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00742.x
11. Guillier M, Boselli E, Bouvet L, et al. Levobupivacaine hydrochloride and sufentanil have no antimicrobial effect at 25°C in vitro. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24(7):634-639. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507000026
12. Coghlan MW, Davies MJ, Hoyt C, Joyce L, Kilner R, Waters MJ. Antibacterial activity of epidural infusions. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(1):66-69.
13. Aydin ON, Eyigor M, Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of lidocaine and bupivacaine on wound pathogens. Anaesthesia. 2001;18(10):687-694. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2001.00900.x
14. Feldman JM, Chapin-Robertson K, Turner J. Do agents used for epidural analgesia have antimicrobial properties? Reg Anesth. 1994;19(1):43-47.
Volume 3, Issue 3, 2026
Page : 63-67
_Footer